Ripple, the prominent crypto company, is now facing legal battles after a US judge in California greenlit a lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit revolves around allegations of misleading statements made by Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse.
The lawsuit stems from a 2017 interview with the Business News Network where Garlinghouse stated, “I’m long XRP, I’m very, very long XRP as a percentage of my personal balance sheet.” In the interview, he expressed skepticism towards other digital assets, emphasizing the real utility and scalability of XRP. This statement has now come under scrutiny, leading to a legal battle for Ripple.
Ripple attempted to dismiss the claim of misleading statements by arguing that XRP does not qualify as a security. However, Judge Phyllis Hamilton raised concerns regarding investors’ expectations of profit when investing in XRP. While XRP may not be classified as a security, the judge highlighted that selling XRP to non-institutional investors could change its categorization. She pointed out that investors’ anticipation of profit aligns with one of the parameters of the Howey Test, potentially making XRP a security in certain contexts.
The approval of the lawsuit indicates that Ripple will now have to face legal proceedings, with a jury tasked to determine whether Garlinghouse’s statements were indeed misleading. This legal battle could have significant implications for Ripple as a company, as well as for investors who have invested in XRP based on the information provided by its CEO.
Ripple’s legal battles highlight the importance of transparency and accuracy in the crypto industry. The case underscores the potential consequences of making misleading statements, especially when it comes to investments. As the legal proceedings unfold, both Ripple and its investors will have to navigate through the repercussions of this controversy.
Leave a Reply